A major move has been made in efforts to reverse 2020 presidential election results.
As reports surfaced on Tuesday that the state of Texas filed suit with the U.S. Supreme Court against four other states.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton officially requested Monday night the Supreme Court invalidate election results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia. A stunning development few might have predicted.
The filing argued those state officials violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval. This news coming on the safe harbor deadline of December 8th. The date by which states must certify election results for submission to Congress.
In addition, Paxton petitioned the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “from taking action to certify presidential electors or [having] such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”
A main point of contention here is that changes made by the state governors, secretaries of state and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
Disclose.tv told on Twitter: “BREAKING – U.S. Supreme Court will hear Texas’ lawsuit against, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin over potential voter fraud. The case was added to the Supreme Court docket today.”
BREAKING – U.S. Supreme Court will hear Texas' lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin over potential voter fraud. The case was added to the Supreme Court docket today. pic.twitter.com/BzSsct1Pq9
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
An official statement said: “The four states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election.”
STORY CONTINUES BELOW...
Then claimed, “The battleground states flooded their people with unlawful ballot applications and ballots while ignoring statutory requirements as to how they were received, evaluated and counted.” Do they make a convincing case?
Paxton also expressed, “By ignoring both state and federal law, these states not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections.”
Plus he declared, “Their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election. We now ask that the Supreme Court step in to correct this egregious error.” Will such claims be validated in court?